Blogue - Dernières entrées

Écrit par: Alessandro

11 septembre 2009|Mots-clés:

0 Commentaire(s)|Lu 4760 fois

The Articles of Confederation And Perpetual Union, lived a short life because Americans disapproved of a strong central government. The articles eventually paved the way for the Constitution. As for the theory of strong central government, Alexander Hamilton was to eventually take up that cause with great skill and intelligence. Much to Thomas Jefferson’s dismay.

In total, there were 13 articles but for our purposes here, Article XI is of note:

Canada acceding to this confederation, and adjoining in the measures of the United States, shall be admitted into, and entitled to all the advantages of this Union; but no other colony shall be admitted into the same, unless such admission be agreed to by nine States.

Golly gee. Canada mentioned. Albeit in an annexation capacity. Wonder if the proponents of the North American Union know about this. I further wonder if Michael Ignatieff will sign on to it. Didn’t the Rhinoceros Party want to sell Canada to the United States in its hey-day?


I recently read about Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s tour of the Arctic. While Arctic sovereignty remains an issue for the government, Harper is also focusing on matters relating to health and welfare.

The issue of arctic sovereignty is nothing new for Canada and it has always been, for the most part, a priority over health and welfare.

Quite frankly, Ottawa’s timid policies in the North have been downright comical since the turn of the 20th century. Without a clear idea of how to execute its goals and objectives, Canada’s fumbling has left the Arctic vulnerable. It had a large part to play in allowing for countries - Denmark, Norway, Russia and the United States - to boldly test its nerves.

Despite holding the title to Rupert’s Land, Ottawa generally treated the North with naive indifference leading it to be less pro-active and more reactive.

As the nation expanded territorially, in population and in economic stature at the turn of the 20th century, the arctic was perceived to be a barren piece of wasteland. Despite Canada’s growth, it lacked a certain maturity when it came to asserting its interests - a character trait we still possess.

It wasn’t until American whalers, present as far back as the 1880s, began to assert themselves in the region (specifically on Herschel Island in the Beaufort Sea) did the government under Sir Wilfrid Laurier decide to take some action by sending a Mounted Police detachment.

Poorly executed and severely undermanned (eight in total over a 16-year period between 1903-1919!), the lack of support from Ottawa left the officers in a precarious if not embarrassing position. For example, they had to rely on the American whalers for equipment and provisions!

Nonetheless, the Mounted Police (Sam Steele and Charles Constantine are two reputable names drenched in Arctic folklore) grew in legend. Somehow, someway, they managed to get things done. In spite of all the odds, a brave Canadian spirit and identity was forged through their work. Alas, has it gone in vain?

Canada tried to occupy a massive territory with too small with no realistic and cohesive plan or workable legal framework. Moreover, it paternalistically employed policies with little or no Native input to their social detriment. Not much has changed.

In the end, Canada was neither able to exert control or take care of its Inuit population.

At present, the Canadian Rangers patrol the area and are a source of Native pride. In 2008, the Harper government called for an expansion from roughly 3000 (mostly reservists) to 5000 by 2012.

The Conservatives are correct to revisit the issue, however, perhaps it should consider giving more autonomy to the region to help defend and enhance Canadian interests.

Either way, it will take a boatload of commitment and cold hard cash along with a harsh dose of realism to exert permanent control once and for all.

In July, I visited Washington D.C. on a casual political pilgrimage. It was the only place to have a chat with Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson. Abe and Tommy were just fab with their advice and insights.

Washington is a most intriguing city. Thanks to the convergence of Virginia and Maryland, its urban planning is confusing. My GPS, a toy I’m not too fond of (I’d rather rely on my brain. It rarely fails me…debateable of course), had a hard time making sense of it. It took me 30 minutes to find my Best Western hotel in Georgetown.

We finally settled in and began to immediately absorb the gentle southern sensibility Washington exuded. I asked a few natives whether Maryland was “officially” a Southern state. They couldn’t answer me in the definite, what, with it being the capital and a “border” state during the Civil War.

There was too much to see and do in just one day and a half. We decided to take a trolley across down. It was the only realistic way to get a glimpse of the city. On and off we went the trolley and it was worth it. For next time, we know what and where we want to focus.

One of those spots is Arlington National Cemetery. Many Canadians probably never heard of it and if they have it was recently when it was announced Ted Kennedy (scratches head) was going to be buried there. Still scratching.

Washington and Canada have a special connection I discovered. Nationalists here, predictably, take a twisted pride in the fact we (well, technically the British) burned down the White House in 1812. However, on our trolley journey along Pennsylvania Ave., we discovered Canada’s embassy was located there as opposed to Embassy Row to “mark the special bond between the two countries” as the guide put it.

Makes sense to me. There is a special connection between Canada and the United States.

Arlington Cemetery, too, commemorates Canada. Specifically, its  military heritage. While Canadian soldiers aren’t buried on Arlington’s hallowed grounds, our nation and flag are. It turns out, Americans fought under the Canadian flag during World War I and Mackenzie King, the long-serving Canadian Prime Minister, suggested in 1925 a memorial be built to remember this and President Calvin Coolidge obliged.

This became known as the Canadian Cross of Sacrifice. The monument was designed by Canadian Sir Reginald Bloomfield.

Canada has a proud military history and heritage. I visited the monuments dedicated to Canadians in Dieppe. France and the Netherlands, two nations liberated by Canada, have never forgotten our efforts and sacrifices.

Sadly, Canadians have. We’ve let our military pitifully whither and wallow into obscurity.

It’s a shame.

Écrit par: Simon

30 avril 2009|

0 Commentaire(s)|Lu 2184 fois

Mon éducation religieuse se résume à la parabole du gros Boileau, un voisin d’enfance qui, importuné par la lumière divine – la croix de néon du clocher de l’église rayonnait dans sa chambre et l’empêchait de dormir – avait une nuit grimpé au sommet de la flèche et réorienté la croix pour qu’elle éveille d’autres esprits que le sien. J’ai toujours été favorablement impressionné par cette histoire.

Païen de naissance, pionnier des cours de morale, poster boy de l’éducation laïque, j’aurais naturellement dû me réjouir de voir Levi Riven, hassidique dissident, quitter la vie religieuse pour entrer dans la vie séculaire qui est la mienne, la nôtre. Un homme en noir ferme le Talmud, laisse tomber le schtreimel et plonge tête première dans notre société libre, dans notre siècle lumineux…Mais (bon Dieu), qui a vraiment envie de ce siècle ? de cette modernité abrutissante? de la télévision ? de la mode ? Quels enseignements sont à trouver dans notre carnaval de vanités?

Lire le reste de cet article ››