Blog - Last posts

Written by: admin

22 avril 2010|

0 Comments|Read 510 times

I was thinking about Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ while chomping down on an egg roll earlier. I didn’t watch the film nor do I plan to. Obviously, this post shan’t attempt to review the film itself. However, the subject of the film is enough for me.

I’ll tell you what’ll be incovenient. If 10,20,30 years from now the film will still be shown in classrooms or the data will continue to be adjusted so as to meet the ever challenges of nature’s demands.Some pony tailed dude in broken down sandals weakened physically (with a brain fed on nothing but sunflower sprouts - which are delicious in a sandwich and salad by the way. I add toasted almonds to that and hm-mm! Good feedin’!) by a vegan diet will continue to preach to a new generation of kids about the inevitability of it all. At some point, dude will be right, right? Give the guy some credit for sticking to his beliefs. Seriously.

Further inconveniences will happen if sequels are made. The only reason why I bring this up is not because I don’t believe we abuse the earth (I think we do), but because (as a somewhat of a betting man), I wage that the doomsday scenarios depicted if  “we don’t act” won’t happen. Not at the speed, at least, posited by global warming/climate change practitioners. I don’t know what to call them anymore.

One last note about Gore, why does he hide behind a movie to espouse his views but doesn’t debate publicly about the terror in our midst? One would think if we’re in dire circumstances the guy would tirelessly hit the public speaking discourse.

How convenient!

http://friendlymisanthropist.blogspot.com/search/label/climate%20change

Written by: admin

21 avril 2010|

0 Comments|Read 409 times

Women who wear revealing clothing and behave promiscuously are to blame for earthquakes, an Iranian cleric says.

Hojjat ol-eslam Kazem Sediqi, the acting Friday prayer leader in Tehran, said women should stick to strict codes of modesty to protect themselves.

“Many women who do not dress modestly lead young men astray and spread adultery in society which increases earthquakes,” he explained.

Tens of thousands of people have died in Iran earthquakes in the last decade.

Mr Sediqi was delivering a televised sermon at the Tehran University campus mosque last Friday on the need for a “general repentance” by Iranians when he warned of a “prevalence of degeneracy”.

“What can we do to avoid being buried under the rubble? There is no other solution but to take refuge in religion and to adapt our lives to Islam’s moral codes,” he said.

‘Disappoint God’

Correspondents say many young Iranians sometimes push the boundaries of how they can dress, showing hair under their headscarves or wearing tight-fitting clothes.

Mr Sediqi also described the violence following last year’s disputed presidential election - the result of which prompted thousands of people to hold mass protests - as a “political earthquake”.

“Now if a natural earthquake hits Tehran, no one will be able to confront such a calamity but God’s power, only God’s power. So lets not disappoint God.”

More than 25,000 people died when a powerful earthquake hit the ancient city of Bam in 2003.

Seismologists have warned that the capital, Tehran, is situated on a large number of tectonic fault lines and could be hit by a devastating earthquake soon.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said many of Tehran’s 12 million inhabitants should relocate.

There are plans to build a purpose built new capital near Qom.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8631775.stm

Written by: admin

13 avril 2010|

0 Comments|Read 1163 times

The crime statistics of world’s five most dangerous cities are disheartening and shocking. With such high rates of homicide, robberies and violence these cities deservedly bear the names of ‘the places of chaos and death’ or ‘the murder capitals of the world’. Despite the scary data, some of them still remain wanted tourist destinations, though extreme caution is strongly advised when visiting.

5. Cape Town. South Africa.

62 killings per 100 000 residents

Crime has been a major problem in South Africa (both for locals and travelers) for many years now, and the murder and robbery statistics loom large in today’s society.
The “good” news is that the number of killings declined by 3.4% to around 18 000 (sic!) between April 2008 and March 2009. Still there are 50 murders a day in South Africa. The latest data shows that there have been 71,500 sexual offenses (10% increase), 18,400 burglaries (27% increase), and 13,900 business robberies (41% increase) reported from April 2008 to March 2009. If it’s any consolation, the street robbery declined by 7% to 72,194.

The beautifully located Cape Town is among the most dangerous towns in the country due to its high level of robberies, rapes, kidnappings and murders. The city is about the same size as Caracas and it has a murder rate of 62 per 100,000 inhabitants. According to the police, the homicides usually occur in the poorer districts and suburbs of the town rather than in upscale areas. Due to the poverty (the country has been facing a deep recession) the robberies are common. Therefore, traveling alone and using ATM’s at night is not advised.

4. New Orleans. The USA.

95 killings per 100 000 residents

The homicide rate in New Orleans ranks way above other American cities and towns, and therefore the city has been named the murder capital of the USA. The total number of murders equaled 179 in 2008 in this small city of around 300,000 residents. Nevertheless, there have been 15% fewer killings in 2008 than in 2007 when the police reported 210 murders. Also other crime rates are dropping in the town. Rape went down by 44% and armed robbery 4.85% in 2008 in comparison to 2007.

Still, according to the FBI data there have been 95 homicides per 100,000 residents in 2008. In turn New Orleans Police Department reported 67 murders per 100,000 in 2008. A scary comparison has recently been made by the Time magazine stating that Baghdad in Iraq with its murder rate of about 48 per 100,000 people is now being safer, considering the statistics, than New Orleans.
Violent crime is a serious problem especially in the low-income neighborhoods of the town. Lonely Planet advises travelers to New Orleans to be cautious and avoid walks at night, especially if you are alone.

3. Caracas. Venezuela.

130 killings per 100 000 residents

Another unsafe destination among world’s most dangerous cities is Caracas, the capital of Venezuela.
At the end of 2008 the Foreign Policy magazine called the city “the murder capital of the world”. According to the official statistics there have been 130 homicides per 100,000 residents in 2008. Only in December 2008 there were at least 510 people killed in the capital, as CNN reported.

The problems of Caracas are not only drug trade and gang battles, but also increasing poverty of the city inhabited by around 4 million people. Murders mainly take place in the capital’s poorest areas - between 1970s and 1990s the poverty rate increased by 300% to 65%. Although during the oil boom the economic situation improved, the poverty level remains very high.

Moreover, experts underline that the murder ratio has increased by 67% since President Chavez took control over the country. There is police abuse, no gun control, and no good control over the militias, as various media report.

2. Ciudad Juárez. Mexico

130 killings per 100 000 residents

Also Mexico, one of the world’s greatest travel destinations thanks to its fascinating history and stunning natural sites, is, unfortunately, facing a serious problem of robbery, kidnapping, sexual assault and drug-related crimes.
Among worst affected areas in the country is the Chihuahua state and, above all, Ciudad Juárez. The city located across the U.S and Mexican border, home to 1.5 million people, has recently got a very bad reputation due to its shocking rates of violence. Bloody and violent fighting between the drug cartels have spread across the town, posing a serious threat to locals and travelers.

Since January 2007 there have been 8330 drug-related murders reported in Mexico, of which 50% accounted for Ciudad Juárez. The city reports 130 murders per 100,000 inhabitants (as of August 2009), which is currently the world’s highest murder rate ( outside the official war zone). In February 2009 the U.S. State Department announced that since January 2008 there had been 1,800 people killed in the city.

1. Mogadishu. Somalia.

No data

The governments’ warnings about traveling to Somalia are unanimous: this African country remains extremely dangerous and there is an enormous risk to anyone’s security due to the threat of terrorism, clan-based and ethnic fighting as well as high level of kidnapping and piracy off the coast.

The epicenter of this brutal crimes and cruelty is Mogadishu, Somalia’s capital. The city has been devastated by the ongoing civil war. As of 2008, around half of the city’s population (0.5 million) have left the war-torn capital, according to the United Nations. Dozens of people are wounded every day in Mogadishu, and frequent bombings kill many of civilians. No one really knows how many people have been killed in the city, but without dispute Mogadishu remains the most lawless and dangerous city in the world. This is how BBC describes the everyday scenes in Mogadishu: “The crump of mortars; the crackle of gunfire; eerily empty streets; prowling guerrillas and looters; sprawling refugee camps; hospitals overflowing with casualties, their bodies smashed open by bullets, shells and shrapnel…”.

Since the overthrow of President Siad Barre in 1991 one million people have lost lives in Somalia due to the civil war and famine.

Written by: admin

12 avril 2010|

0 Comments|Read 448 times

JOHANNESBURG - Giant footballs and national flags line the streets as South Africa counts down to the World Cup, but with two months to go until kick-off, fears about violence and racial strife linger.

As the June 11 opening match nears, Africa’s much-anticipated first World Cup is materializing in football fever with South Africans donning team jerseys, flying flags and a marketing onslaught by host cities.

But concerns about violence and racial tension in the crime-plagued country have re-emerged after the murder of a white supremacist leader.

The killing of Eugene Terre’Blanche, allegedly hacked to death after a wage dispute on his farm, has focused new attention on violent crime and race tensions in South Africa after his supporters initially vowed revenge.

“It’s not going to happen,” local organizing committee chief Danny Jordaan said Thursday.

The South African government, which has spent 33 million rands (US $4.5 million) on the tournament, hopes to give a boost to the country’s image, luring foreign tourists and investment.

It is also counting on the event to build national unity in a country that still bears the scars of apartheid 16 years after the end of the segregationist regime.

On April 15, South Africans will for the first time be able to buy match tickets at sales windows instead of online, coming away with tickets in hand.

World Cup banners and football jerseys have become ubiquitous, and street vendors’ stalls are dripping with football gear.

Adding to the air of celebration, FIFA announced last month that the June 10 kick-off concert in Johannesburg will feature such international celebrities as Shakira, Alicia Keys and the Black Eyed Peas.

Recently, national flags have been flying from car windows even in white neighbourhoods, where football has never been popular, and giant inflated footballs have dotted host cities.

Last month the police department said it would deploy 41,000 extra police and keep the army on a “state of alert” during the tournament.

The country’s security measure also received a nod from the Interpol, which last month said it was satisfied with the country’s security plans.

But South Africa has in recent months seen scores of violent protests over shoddy public services in poor neighbourhoods, and violence over a new bus networks to overhaul long-neglected public transport ahead of the tournament.

The cities’ collective mini-bus drivers, who for decades enjoyed a monopoly as the apartheid regime, have protested violently against the systems.

As the June 11 opening match nears, South Africa’s worries also extend to the mediocre performance of the national side Bafana Bafana (The Boys), who will play Mexico at Soccer City in the curtain-raiser.

Coach Carlos Parreira said the team needs to improve its fitness and ball possession.

“If there’s one thing I’d like to see the team do much better, it’s in valuing the ball possession,” he told journalists.

“If you see games here in the league, it’s like table tennis. Go and come, go and come. Nobody keeps the ball.”

Click here to know more

Written by: admin

06 avril 2010|

0 Comments|Read 938 times

A safe, friendly environment with an excellent education system for her children – that’s what Sameena Arif, a teacher from Islamabaad, Pakistan, was looking for when she chose to immigrate to Canada in 2004. She found what she hoped for in Calgary, Alberta and gives the city top marks in other areas as well.

“There are many opportunities for people in Alberta and it’s a great place to live,” said Sameena, who heard about Calgary from her uncle. “The people are very friendly, and the school system is excellent. I’ve traveled a lot and I’ve been to the United States as well, but for me, the decision to live in Alberta was an easy one.”

The first time Sameena and her family came to Canada was in 2002 to visit friends in Toronto. A year later, they visited Calgary for a month to get a taste of the western part of the country. The family returned to Pakistan for about a year, during which time Sameena and her husband divorced. In 2004, Sameena felt it was time to make a fresh start and moved to Calgary with her children.

In some ways, Canada is similar to Pakistan. The land is very green and beautiful, with mountains and lakes. But for Sameena, the things that make the countries different are what concerned her most. “In Pakistan, to be able to live the kind of lifestyle we are living now and for my children to have the kind of education they have now, I would probably have to work five jobs,” explained Sameena, whose children are now 15, 12 and seven.

Safety was also an issue. In Islamabaad, the capital of Pakistan, Sameena says she often worried about her children. “It’s scary when you have to worry that when your children leave the house they may not come back. Here in Alberta, it’s very reassuring to know my family is safe.”

Deciding to make the move to Alberta was also a chance for Sameena to become an independent woman – something she very much wanted to be. When she came to Alberta, she was 31 years old. “In my culture some people consider a woman’s life to be over when she turns 30, especially if the woman had her children at a young age like I did,” explained Sameena. “One of the best things about moving to Alberta is that I feel like my life is just beginning.” She laughs about how some Albertans referred to her as “kiddo” when she first came to Calgary. “I loved that!” she said.

But while coming to Alberta as a single woman made her feel strong and independent, it also made her feel nervous and stressed much of the time. Sameena credits the Calgary Immigrant Women’s Association for helping her make the transition smoothly. “I was looking on the Internet one night and came across the association’s website. With their help, I received counseling services, and advice about government services that could help me. Everyone has been very supportive,” she said.

Sameena encourage people from other countries to consider immigrating to Alberta because of all the province has to offer. With a bachelor’s degree in arts majoring in education, Sameena would like to get a job teaching English to adult immigrants as a way to give back to the system that helped her create a new life for her family. “A language barrier can be a major challenge for someone moving to a new country. I’m relieved I didn’t have that obstacle to overcome but if I can help make the process easier for someone else, I would love to help,” she said.

Let us know if you have any stories about how you came to Canada.

Written by: admin

05 avril 2010|

0 Comments|Read 411 times

There is no prouder moment in Haiti’s history than Jan. 1, 1804, when a band of statesmen-warriors declared independence from France, casting off colonialism and slavery to become the world’s first black republic.

They proclaimed their freedom boldly — “we must live independent or die,” they wrote — but for decades, Haiti lacked its own official copy of those words. Its Declaration of Independence existed only in handwritten duplicate or in newspapers. Until now.

A Canadian graduate student at Duke University, Julia Gaffield, has unearthed from the British National Archives the first known, government-issued version of Haiti’s founding document. The eight-page pamphlet, now visible online, gives scholars new insights into a period with few primary sources. But for Haitian intellectuals, the discovery has taken on even broader significance.

That the document would be found in February, just weeks after the earthquake that killed so many; that its authenticity would be confirmed in time for the donor conference that could define Haiti’s future — some see providence at work.

“It’s a strange thing in the period of the earthquake we find the first document that made the state,” said Patrick Tardieu, an archivist at the Library of the Fathers of the Holy Spirit in Port-au-Prince. “People were searching for this for a very long time.”

Indeed, decades ago, Haiti’s leaders went hunting for a declaration they could call their own for the country’s 150th anniversary. Researchers combed Haiti’s libraries. Newspapers in the United States, which printed full versions of the declaration when it was made, were also considered a possible source.

But the originals seemed to have been thrown out or destroyed. In December 1952, the Haitian intellectual Edmond Mangonès wrote to his country’s Commission of Social Sciences to report that “the mystery of the original of our national Declaration of Independence” had not been solved. “All searches to date have been in vain,” he said.

Enter Ms. Gaffield, 26. She said she fell in love with Haiti while at the University of Toronto. It was 2004, Jean-Bertrand Aristide had just been ousted, and after a trip to Haiti, where she worked with street children, she decided to study its origins as a nation.

That eventually took her to Duke University, and last year, to the National Archives of Jamaica in Kingston. There, she found a letter from a British official who had just returned from Haiti around the time of its revolution.

“He wrote a letter to the governor saying, ‘Here is this interesting document that I received when I was in Haiti,’ ” she said. “And he said the declaration ‘had not been but one hour from the press.’ ”

The document he mentioned, though, was missing. She headed for London. On Feb. 2, she found herself poring through the leather-bound binders of Britain’s National Archives. About 100 pages into the book of Jamaican records from 1804, she came across a delicate, yellowed set of pages.

“What I first noticed was across the top it said, ‘Liberté ou La Mort,’ ” she said. There were a few differences from the accepted text of Thomas Madiou, the 19th-century historian who wrote a definitive, multivolume history of the country. Haiti was spelled Hayti in the pamphlet, for example, and in one sentence, Mr. Madiou seemed to have seen “idéux” (ideals) when the print shows it to be “fléaux” (ills).

The bottom of the last page read “De l’Imprimerie du Gouvernement.” That made it the official declaration historians had been looking for. In the hushed London library — even cameras snapping photos of important documents must be on silent mode — Ms. Gaffield could only smirk.

“Being very excited in a document reading room is a bit of a challenge,” she said. “You have to keep it all inside.”

Later that day, she e-mailed her Ph.D. advisers at Duke. They were thrilled. “It is a lost treasure,” said Deborah Jenson, a professor of French who has been overseeing Ms. Gaffield’s research. “This is really the first copy that is directly tied to the Haitian government.”

Professor Jenson said no manuscript version of the declaration with signatures — along the lines of the United States’ document — seemed to have existed. Jean-Jacques Dessalines, Haiti’s revolutionary leader, delivered the declaration as a speech on Jan. 1, 1804, and then had it printed over the next few months. Historians believe that he and others overlooked documentary preservation because they were too worried about another French invasion.

“They were building forts,” said Prof. Laurent M. Dubois, a historian of Haiti at Duke. “It’s part of the larger story: that Haiti knew it was going to be isolated, it knew it was attacking this broader social order.”

He said the pamphlet showed that Haiti was intent on sending out the declaration to get the world to understand its position. “This was a gesture of reaching out, of saying, ‘We have these grievances, and we have decided we have to be independent, to refuse and resist this social order we have lived under,’ ” Professor Dubois said. “They wanted recognition.”

That is exactly what some Haitians hope Ms. Gaffield’s find will bring to Haiti today. Mr. Tardieu said he dreamed of seeing the document returned to its home — “it would be the greatest gift,” he said — while others are praying that its discovery alone will reawaken the world to Haiti’s strong sense of self-determination.

“In the context of the Haitian tragedy, it is important for Haitians and the rest of the world to remember the independence of Haiti,” said Leslie Manigat, a historian who briefly served as Haiti’s president in 1988.

“We must recover,” he said, shouting in order to be heard through a phone in Port-au-Prince that cut out repeatedly. “We must find an alternative to the traditional meaning of independence, now, in the new world.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/world/americas/01document.html

Written by: admin

26 mars 2010|

0 Comments|Read 560 times

Controversial U.S. political commentator Ann Coulter said she’s determined to “save the good Canadians” in Calgary and regions west from “crazy liberals,” a day after she was met by protests in Ottawa.

Coulter spoke at the University of Calgary on Thursday night, the last stop of a three-city Canadian tour. She is famous for inflammatory comments against Muslims, liberals and gay people.

Her speech at the University of Ottawa was cancelled after safety concerns amid protests on Tuesday night.

“It’s quite a country you have here,” Coulter told Evan Solomon, host of Power & Politics, on CBC News Network on Thursday. “I’m more determined than ever to turn pretty much from Calgary through the west into the 51st state now. We got to save the good Canadians.”

“Save us from what, Ann?” Solomon asked.

“From the crazy liberals. From the crybabies,” Coulter answered, sporting sunglasses. “How did Canada go from being the country that sends us all our best comedians to a bunch of whining, crying babies that can’t take a joke?”

Written by: admin

22 mars 2010|

0 Comments|Read 913 times

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a historic health-care bill late Sunday that will make coverage possible for more than 30 million uninsured Americans and end discrimination by insurance companies against people with existing medical conditions.

Legislators voted 219 to 212 in favour of the landmark legislation that has been debated on Capitol Hill for a year. The bill, previously passed by the Senate, didn’t receive a single vote from Republicans. It will now go to President Barack Obama for his signing into law, possibly as early as Tuesday.

“It is with great humility and with great pride that we tonight will make history for our country and progress for the American people,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said during her closing argument for health-care reform. “Just think, we will be joining those who established social security, Medicare and now, tonight, health care for all Americans.”

Following the vote, Obama said, “This is what change looks like.

“We proved we are a people capable of doing big things and tackling our biggest challenges,” he said. “We proved that this government — a government of the people and by the people —still works for the people.”

Overhauling of the health-care system is the most ambitious U.S. social program since Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society reforms of the tumultuous 1960s and Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal that emerged from the trauma of the Great Depression in the 1930s.

Resolving differences

The passage of the legislation was made possible by a last-minute deal struck earlier in the day between the White House and House Democrats who were holding out over abortion concerns.

The White House said in a statement that Obama would issue an executive order after passage of the health-care bill that would reaffirm current law banning federal spending on abortion, except in cases of rape, incest or a threat to the mother’s life.

Moments after the statement, leading abortion foe Bart Stupak, a Democrat congressman from Michigan, and six other anti-abortion Democrats said they would back the health-care bill.

“We’re well past 216,” Stupak told reporters, referring to the number of votes required to pass the bill in the House of Representatives.

The legislation would extend coverage to an estimated 32 million uninsured Americans, bar insurers from denying coverage on the basis of existing medical conditions and cut federal deficits by an estimated $138 billion US over a decade.

Congressional analysts estimate the cost of the two bills combined would be $940 billion over 10 years.

Amid talk of success for Obama’s efforts to expand health coverage to the uninsured, Republicans resolutely opposed the bill.

Written by: admin

17 mars 2010|

0 Comments|Read 21127 times

The Opposition called on the Quebec government to clamp down on so-called reasonable accommodation of minority groups after the province’s human rights commission ruled that the health insurance board has no obligation to satisfy religious or cultural preferences.

In separate opinions issued Tuesday, the commission weighed in on three cases involving people who asked that their religious, cultural or linguistic preferences be accommodated when dealing with employees of the province’s health insurance board, the Régie de l’assurance-maladie du Québec (RAMQ).

Up until Tuesday, RAMQ did accommodate such requests on a case-by-case basis, handling about a dozen a year.

Parti-Québécois immigration critic Louise Beaudoin said the commission’s ruling should serve as the basis for a new law declaring all public services officially secular — and banning all accommodation of religious preferences.

“That’s what we would like to stop: that case-by-case method of doing things,” said Beaudoin. “We have to do something.”

Written by: admin

11 mars 2010|

0 Comments|Read 551 times

The blonde middle-aged woman apparently raised no concerns with her boyfriend or her neighbours on Main Street, Pennsburg, near Philadelphia.

But online she had allegedly agreed to kill in the name of holy war, believing her European looks would allow her to blend in among Swedes as she homed in on her target.

Colleen LaRose, according to a US court indictment, posted messages online under the name Jihad Jane, expressing her desire to participate in jihad, or holy war.

Arrested in October 2009, Ms LaRose had exchanged emails over 15 months to recruit fighters for “violent jihad”.

Her activities apparently came as a surprise to her boyfriend Kurt Gorman, whom she met in 2005.

Mr Gorman told Associated Press: “She was a good-hearted person. She pretty much stayed around the house.”

‘Pleasure to die for’

She looked after his father until his death in August 2009, but left their residence a day after the father’s funeral, taking Mr Gorman’s passport with her, allegedly to give to a contact in South Asia she had agreed to marry.

“I came home and she was gone. It doesn’t make any sense,” he said.

Having left the US in August, by the end of September, she had allegedly written online that it would be “an honour & great pleasure to die or kill for” her intended spouse, the indictment said.
“Only death will stop me here that I am so close to the target!” she is accused of writing.

A Department of Justice statement said Ms LaRose and five others “recruited men on the internet to wage violent jihad in South Asia and Europe, and recruited women on the internet who had passports and the ability to travel to and around Europe in support of violent jihad”.

Ms LaRose, a US citizen born in 1963, is charged with “conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, conspiracy to kill in a foreign country, making false statements to a government official and attempted identity theft.”

She was apparently approached by others after she posted a video on YouTube in June 2008, saying she was “desperate to do something somehow to help” ease the suffering of Muslims, the indictment said.

Web images show her wearing a Muslim headscarf, but Mr Gorman said he never saw anything like that at their home, nor did she attend any religious services.

Unknown to him, she had allegedly agreed to travel to Sweden and kill Swedish artist Lars Vilks, who had angered Muslims by drawing the Prophet Muhammad with the body of a dog.

She denies soliciting funds for terrorist groups and of being the Jihad Jane of online postings, the indictment said.

Very few women have been charged with terrorism in the US, the Justice Department said.

Click here to know more